<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ExchangeBlog &#187; ExchangeBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exchangeblog.pl/en/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/</link>
	<description>Blog technologii MS Exchange Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stellar EDB to PST converter &#8211; review by angry customer</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2014/01/stellar-edb-to-pst-converter-review/#comment-535920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angry customer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=4662#comment-535920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before buying a license of EDB to PST converting tool, I made sure that japanese language was supported by contacting them.

Unfortunately, after a few tests, when the tool is in &quot;Offline mode&quot;, it cannot read correctly information from EDB file. The japanese characters are all messed up, useless for us. 

I contacted the support, provided a sample edb file and after a few mails finally the problem was escalated.

I asked regularly to know if the problem could be reproduced in their environment but they could not give me any information, I just had to wait...

Finally they said that they could reproduce the problem and that next version would contain the fix ! But they had no visibility about when next version would be available, I just had to check their website regularly..

Finally I tried the new version after a few months and of course the problem is not fixed at all !

Feature that was supposed to be working doesn&#039;t work (japanese support), the &quot;fixed version&quot; doesn&#039;t work and the support could not give me any information regarding the progress on this case...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before buying a license of EDB to PST converting tool, I made sure that japanese language was supported by contacting them.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, after a few tests, when the tool is in &#8220;Offline mode&#8221;, it cannot read correctly information from EDB file. The japanese characters are all messed up, useless for us. </p>
<p>I contacted the support, provided a sample edb file and after a few mails finally the problem was escalated.</p>
<p>I asked regularly to know if the problem could be reproduced in their environment but they could not give me any information, I just had to wait&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally they said that they could reproduce the problem and that next version would contain the fix ! But they had no visibility about when next version would be available, I just had to check their website regularly..</p>
<p>Finally I tried the new version after a few months and of course the problem is not fixed at all !</p>
<p>Feature that was supposed to be working doesn&#8217;t work (japanese support), the &#8220;fixed version&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work and the support could not give me any information regarding the progress on this case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exchange 2010 remove mobile device Error The ActiveSyncDevice Cannot be Found by Rosario</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2013/01/exchange-2010-remove-mobile-device-error-the-activesyncdevice-cannot-be-found/#comment-528698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosario]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=2870#comment-528698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot, we indeed have a lot of movements in the Active Directory OUs so I combined your two methods in one ps-script and it worked like a charm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, we indeed have a lot of movements in the Active Directory OUs so I combined your two methods in one ps-script and it worked like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exchange 2010 ActiveSync Devices list by User</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/10/exchange-2010-activesync-devices-list/#comment-481721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[User]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=1440#comment-481721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to get the information for the list of users with the Mobile devices connected .

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to get the information for the list of users with the Mobile devices connected .</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove (purge) Disconnected Mailboxes by Travis</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/how-to-remove-purge-disconnected-mailboxes/#comment-479430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=713#comment-479430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like your blog helpfully added smart quotes on your code snippets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like your blog helpfully added smart quotes on your code snippets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search-Mailbox search and remove emails by Jake</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/09/search-mailbox-search-and-remove-emails/#comment-472450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=718#comment-472450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for listing the common message properties, it helped me. Do you know where to find a full list? For example, when I try to use search-mailbox with the &quot;-searchdumpsteronly&quot; switch, I would like to avoid pulling in all the old meeting notices and only pull in the message types. Is there a way to use the search-query to only pull the IPM.Note class items? I use this frequently to restore mailboxes from the purges folder, but I don&#039;t want to restore calendar items.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for listing the common message properties, it helped me. Do you know where to find a full list? For example, when I try to use search-mailbox with the &#8220;-searchdumpsteronly&#8221; switch, I would like to avoid pulling in all the old meeting notices and only pull in the message types. Is there a way to use the search-query to only pull the IPM.Note class items? I use this frequently to restore mailboxes from the purges folder, but I don&#8217;t want to restore calendar items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exchange recipients limit by Muthu</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/09/exchange-recipients-limit/#comment-439828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muthu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=1042#comment-439828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This restrictions are not applying for inbound mails. i.e., from external to internal. Do we need to do any extra configuration?

The above said limit only work for our internal users (outbound).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This restrictions are not applying for inbound mails. i.e., from external to internal. Do we need to do any extra configuration?</p>
<p>The above said limit only work for our internal users (outbound).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on List Exchange mailbox folder permissions &#8211; script by Pravin Jha</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2013/03/list-exchange-mailbox-folder-permissions-script/#comment-434832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pravin Jha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=3346#comment-434832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know its an old post. But i am taking my chance. If you are still listening to this post, can you please email the full script. If possible, I need to import mailbox names from a text file or CSV which ever works. I tried Get-Content but I am hitting an error somewhere. 

Also, I don&#039;t need archive mailbox to be included in the report. So, make all these modification is causing typo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know its an old post. But i am taking my chance. If you are still listening to this post, can you please email the full script. If possible, I need to import mailbox names from a text file or CSV which ever works. I tried Get-Content but I am hitting an error somewhere. </p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t need archive mailbox to be included in the report. So, make all these modification is causing typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update Rollup 8 For Exchange 2010 SP3 &#8211; KB2986475 &#8211; Recalled by Remigiusz Szatkowski</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2014/12/update-rollup-8-for-exchange-2010-sp3-kb2986475/#comment-371659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remigiusz Szatkowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=4858#comment-371659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it happens with new updates, and they always says, test it in Lab first before production :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it happens with new updates, and they always says, test it in Lab first before production <img src="http://exchangeblog.pl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update Rollup 8 For Exchange 2010 SP3 &#8211; KB2986475 &#8211; Recalled by Remigiusz Szatkowski</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2014/12/update-rollup-8-for-exchange-2010-sp3-kb2986475/#comment-371648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remigiusz Szatkowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 05:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=4858#comment-371648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, an issue has been identified in the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8 and it has been recalled and is no longer available on the download center]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, an issue has been identified in the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8 and it has been recalled and is no longer available on the download center</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Update Rollup 8 For Exchange 2010 SP3 &#8211; KB2986475 &#8211; Recalled by Susanne</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2014/12/update-rollup-8-for-exchange-2010-sp3-kb2986475/#comment-371636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susanne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 05:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=4858#comment-371636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get used to it :\

 - Reason for Revision: V2.0 (December 10, 2014): Revised bulletin
   to remove Download Center link for Microsoft security update
   2986475 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 3 to
   address a known issue with the update. Microsoft is working
   to address the issue, and will update this bulletin when more
   information becomes available. Microsoft has removed update
   2986475 and recommends that customers uninstall update 2986475
   if they have already installed it.
 - Originally posted: December 9, 2014
 - Updated: December 10, 2014
 - Bulletin Severity Rating: Important
 - Version: 2.0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get used to it :\</p>
<p> &#8211; Reason for Revision: V2.0 (December 10, 2014): Revised bulletin<br />
   to remove Download Center link for Microsoft security update<br />
   2986475 for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 3 to<br />
   address a known issue with the update. Microsoft is working<br />
   to address the issue, and will update this bulletin when more<br />
   information becomes available. Microsoft has removed update<br />
   2986475 and recommends that customers uninstall update 2986475<br />
   if they have already installed it.<br />
 &#8211; Originally posted: December 9, 2014<br />
 &#8211; Updated: December 10, 2014<br />
 &#8211; Bulletin Severity Rating: Important<br />
 &#8211; Version: 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
