<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Exchange 2010 how to reduce the size of the database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/</link>
	<description>Blog technologii MS Exchange Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/#comment-27113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=722#comment-27113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just found the mistake. One of the Mailboxes had already a different archive database, which made up the huge difference.
Thanks you for the great guide and if possible my comments can be deleted :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found the mistake. One of the Mailboxes had already a different archive database, which made up the huge difference.<br />
Thanks you for the great guide and if possible my comments can be deleted <img src="http://exchangeblog.pl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/#comment-27111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=722#comment-27111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we are actually only moving the mailbox archives, not the mailboxes.
This was part of the command we used:
Get-Mailbox -Database $DBSourceName[$i] &#124; New-MoveRequest -ArchiveTargetDatabase $DBTargetName[$i] -ArchiveOnly -BadItemLimit 1000 -AcceptLargeDataLoss
One last MoveRequest is currently still running though, but i don&#039;t think that the edb will be smaller after it finishes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are actually only moving the mailbox archives, not the mailboxes.<br />
This was part of the command we used:<br />
Get-Mailbox -Database $DBSourceName[$i] | New-MoveRequest -ArchiveTargetDatabase $DBTargetName[$i] -ArchiveOnly -BadItemLimit 1000 -AcceptLargeDataLoss<br />
One last MoveRequest is currently still running though, but i don&#8217;t think that the edb will be smaller after it finishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigiusz Szatkowski</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/#comment-27109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Remigiusz Szatkowski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=722#comment-27109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you move all mailboxes from Archiv database to Temp_archive ? 
maybe during migration you also move archive mailboxes if you have it enabled ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you move all mailboxes from Archiv database to Temp_archive ?<br />
maybe during migration you also move archive mailboxes if you have it enabled ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/#comment-27104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=722#comment-27104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are currently trying this and something confuses us:
Name                                    DatabaseSize                            AvailableNewMailboxSpace
----                                    ------------                            ------------------------
ARCHIV                              304.5 GB (326,963,888,128 bytes)        62.59 GB (67,205,300,224 bytes)
TEMP_ARCHIV                         361.8 GB (388,435,083,264 bytes)        74.97 MB (78,610,432 bytes)

Shouldn&#039;t the TEMP_ARCHIV be much smaller than the old ARCHIV-Database?

Thanks for any input]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are currently trying this and something confuses us:<br />
Name                                    DatabaseSize                            AvailableNewMailboxSpace<br />
&#8212;-                                    &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;                            &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
ARCHIV                              304.5 GB (326,963,888,128 bytes)        62.59 GB (67,205,300,224 bytes)<br />
TEMP_ARCHIV                         361.8 GB (388,435,083,264 bytes)        74.97 MB (78,610,432 bytes)</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the TEMP_ARCHIV be much smaller than the old ARCHIV-Database?</p>
<p>Thanks for any input</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: like this</title>
		<link>http://exchangeblog.pl/en/2012/08/microsoft-exchange-2010-how-to-reduce-the-size-of-the-database/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[like this]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exchangeblog.pl/?p=722#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not what I was looking for but great anyway! Nice one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not what I was looking for but great anyway! Nice one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
